From nemecek at san.rr.com Mon Mar 2 14:31:40 2015 From: nemecek at san.rr.com (Nancy Nemecek) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:31:40 -0800 Subject: [ABATE Local 6 Elist] FW: US DEFENDERS -- HANDLEBAR HEIGHT IN SOUTH DAKOTA Message-ID: <0d0801d05538$a7f168d0$f7d43a70$@rr.com> Please read the message below. This probably doesn?t affect a lot of you personally because you don?t have high handle bars or you don?t plan to go to South Dakota, BUT it is a win for motorcycle rights. Keeping our rights or getting them back is a process and diligence and tenacity play a big roll. Good for South Dakota ? Nancy From: Sandra Lubbers [mailto:tlubes at dslextreme.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:51 AM To: undisclosed-recipients: Subject: US DEFENDERS -- FYI US Defenders -- Just in case you hadn't heard the good news coming out of South Dakota -- SB85 introduced to SD State Legislature: "To repeal the requirements regarding handlebar height for motorcycles" * Passed Senate 34-0 * Passed House 69-0 * Signed by Governor 2-25-15 Effective July 1, 2015 -- Ape hangers will no longer be illegal in South Dakota. Score a win for bikers! Great news for those making the trek to Sturgis this year! Please pass this on to your clubs and other interested parties. Respects, ?Pita __________________________ Sandra "Pita" Lubbers tlubes at dslextreme.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nemecek at san.rr.com Mon Mar 9 12:34:36 2015 From: nemecek at san.rr.com (Nancy Nemecek) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:34:36 -0700 Subject: [ABATE Local 6 Elist] ***SPAM*** FW: New Mexico Accomplishments - Helmet Law Attempt Defeated Message-ID: <106a01d05aa0$14359ef0$3ca0dcd0$@rr.com> FYI From: Motorcycle Riders Foundation [mailto:MotorcycleRidersFoundation at wildapricot.org] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 12:28 PM To: nemecek at san.rr.com Subject: New Mexico Accomplishments Motorcycle Riders Foundation http://motorcycleridersfoundation.wildapricot.org/ Facebook Twitter New Mexico Accomplishments March 9, 2015 A recent release went out about the great work being done by the motorcyclists in New Mexico to defeat two helmet law attempts. The Motorcycle Riders Foundation would like to apologize for failing to give credit to multiple organizations in New Mexico. The organizations who did the work, and do deserve the credit are, New Mexico Motorcycle Rights Organization, Coalition of Clubs, US Defenders, National Coalition of Motorcyclists, and many independent riders. S.B. 327 would have simply mandated helmets for all motorcycle operators and passengers. Current law states that motorcyclists seventeen and under must wear a helmet. The second bill, S.B. 308, would have allowed both operator and passenger to ride helmet-less after purchasing a $697 license plate sticker to offset the burden that some believe comes with helmet-less riding. Both bills were killed in the New Mexico Senate Public Affairs Committee by a vote of 4-3. Congratulations to the freedom fighting motorcyclists of New Mexico for the hard work and dedication to defeat these two bills. All Information contained in this release is copyrighted. Reproduction permitted with attribution. Motorcycle Riders Foundation. All rights reserved. Ride With The LeadersTM by joining the MRF at http://motorcycleridersfoundation.wildapricot.org/page-1654836 or call (202) 546-0983 You are receiving this message because you opted in at http://motorcycleridersfoundation.wildapricot.org/ . If you choose to not receive these alerts moving forward, please click the unsubscribe button or contact the office at: mrfoffice at mrf.org Unsubscribe No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9261 - Release Date: 03/09/15 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nemecek at san.rr.com Thu Mar 12 12:57:55 2015 From: nemecek at san.rr.com (Nancy Nemecek) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:57:55 -0700 Subject: [ABATE Local 6 Elist] AB-334 Motorcycle Rider Anti-Profiling Bill - Need Letter or Fax NOW Message-ID: <1b5501d05cfe$d52a4470$7f7ecd50$@rr.com> PLEASE SEND A LETTER OR FAX NOW. Could not find a way to send an email. >From Quirk's webpage there is a form but it will only accept it from his constituents. If anyone finds a way to email a support request, please let me know at nemecek at san.rr.com. Thanks, Nancy Public Safety Hearing - AB-334 Motorcycle Rider Anti-Profiling Bill Tuesday, March 24 at 9:00am California State Capitol in Sacramento Please send letters of support to: Assemblyman Bill Quirk, Chair / Assembly Public Safety Committee / 1020 N Street, Room 126 / Sacramento, Ca. 95814. OR fax to: 916-319-3745 A simple letter or fax is all that is needed: Please support AB334.....your name, address, and signature. PLEASE SEND ASAP LETTER OR FAX IS NEED by the MARCH 19, 2015 to get counted for analysis. Here's some information on the legislation: LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 334, as introduced, Cooley. Peace officers: training: profiling of motorcycle riders. Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training in the Department of Justice and requires the commission to adopt rules establishing minimum standards regarding the recruitment of peace officers. Existing law requires the commission to develop guidelines and implement courses of instruction regarding racial profiling, handling domestic violence, hate crimes, and human trafficking, among others. This bill would require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to ensure that the profiling of motorcycle riders is addressed in the course of basic law enforcement training and offered to law enforcement officers in conjunction with existing training regarding profiling. The bill would require all local law enforcement agencies to adopt a written policy designed to condemn and prevent the profiling of motorcycle riders and to review and audit any existing policies to ensure that those policies do not enable or foster the practice of profiling motorcycle riders. Because this bill would impose additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nemecek at san.rr.com Sun Mar 15 14:03:40 2015 From: nemecek at san.rr.com (Nancy Nemecek) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:03:40 -0700 Subject: [ABATE Local 6 Elist] [ABATE] CTA : AB 334 Anti-Profiling Call to Action INFORMATION FROM LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Message-ID: <005401d05f63$84182400$8c486c00$@rr.com> I sent information the other day about writing or faxing Bill Quirk, Chairman of the Committee on Public Safety, asking support for AB-334. Below is more information from Chuck Pederson, ABATE State Legislative Director. Letters and/or faxes are requested to be sent to ALL members of the Committee. There is a link here Public Safety Committee (and below) giving the names of the committee members. Also below is the list of members in case you cannot open the link. The one fax number can be used for each member (916-319-3745). Please sign your letter or fax and get it sent right away?the bill will be heard early next week so time is of the essence. Please note that Lorena S. Gonzalez, Assembly District 80, is the only one on the committee in San Diego County and covers Chula Vista, National City, and part of San Diego (City Heights to the border mostly). If you cannot do all of the letters/faxes, and I hope you can, please at least do Quirk and Gonzalez. Also below is the bill language and status information. If you have questions, please contact me at nemecek at san.rr.com and I?ll try to get an answer for you. Nancy ****************************************************************************************************************************************************** Below is some information that can be used to send letters of support to the California State Assembly; Committee on Public Safety for AB334, the anti-profiling bill. The hyperlinks below will direct you to the committee member contacts and sample letters. I have also provided this information below for those that cannot utilize the hyperlinks. This should happen within the next week. So lets get the word out! Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Chuck Pedersen State Legislative Director ABATE of California Mail or fax a letter to every member of the Public Safety Committee. Don't forget to sign the letter and provide your address when you send it in. Please send the following applicable letter: In-State California Sample Letter OR Out-Of State Sample Letter Mail Address: Assembly Public Safety Committee: 1020 N. Street, Room 111, Sacramento, CA 95814 Fax Number: 916-319-3745 ***************************************************************************************************** An example letter ? Short Version Dear Assembly Member, I am writing to urge you to support AB 334 relating to motorcycle profiling. The problem is pervasive and irrefutable. The solution is cost-free and preserves the 1st, 4th, and 14th amendments. <
> <> *****************************************************************************************************\ An example letter ? Long Version Dear Assembly Member, As a citizen and motorcyclist in the state of California, I am writing to urge you to support AB 334, legislation addressing the issue of motorcycle profiling. Law enforcement profiling and discrimination targeted at motorcyclists and members of motorcycle related organizations is a pervasive problem demanding legislative relief. Despite the opposition's denials, motorcycle profiling legislation is a virtually cost-free solution and highly effective solution. Indeed, motorcycle profiling is occurring in most regions of California. The motorcycling community has collected a mass of Victim Statements providing irrefutable proof that profiling is occurring. Importantly, this legislature recently took a stand against discrimination by passing a prohibition on motorcycle-only checkpoints. Passing a prohibition against profiling would be consistent and reinforce the principles already embraced by this legislature. Washington State's experience provides empirical validation that motorcycle profiling laws are highly effective with no financial impact. In fact, the Washington legislature passed profiling legislation unanimously in 2011, despite inaccurate and over-blown financial projections provided by law enforcement. Almost 5 years later, motorcycle profiling incidents have been substantially reduced with no fiscal impact at the state or local level. AB 334 models Washington's law so there is every reason to believe that these successes would be replicated. It is understandable that law enforcement would oppose legislation that represents an indict of current practices. The recognition that law enforcement policy and training is required to curb current abuses of discretion is nonetheless a critical responsibility of the legislature. The legislature is responsible for managing the relationship between law enforcement and the constituency that they govern. When this relationship is damaged, society becomes less stable. Recent events around America make this very clear. Legislatures in Maryland, Minnesota, Oklahoma, New York, Missouri, and Arkansas also recognize the importance of the Washington law. These states are all considering laws to address motorcycle profiling this session in hopes of repairing the divide between law enforcement and the motorcycling community. AB 334 provides an opportunity for California to help repair this relationship by substantially reducing incidents of profiling and ending a paradigm of law enforcement discrimination in the largest motorcycling state in America. Sincerely, <
> <> Committee Members Bill Quirk (Chair) Dem - 20 Contact Assembly Member Bill Quirk Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2163, Sacramento, CA 94249-0020; (916) 319-2020 Melissa A. Melendez (Vice Chair) Rep - 67 Contact Assembly Member Melissa A. Melendez Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 6031, Sacramento, CA 94249-0067; (916) 319-2067 Lorena S. Gonzalez Dem - 80 Contact Assembly Member Lorena S. Gonzalez Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 6012, Sacramento, CA 94249-0080; (916) 319-2080 Reginald B. Jones-Sawyer, Sr. Dem - 59 Contact Assembly Member Reginald B. Jones-Sawyer, Sr. Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4126, Sacramento, CA 94249-0059; (916) 319-2059 Tom Lackey Rep - 36 Contact Assembly Member Tom Lackey Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4009, Sacramento, CA 94249-0036; (916) 319-2036 Evan Low Dem - 28 Contact Assembly Member Evan Low Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2175, Sacramento, CA 94249-0028; (916) 319-2028 Miguel Santiago Dem - 53 Contact Assembly Member Miguel Santiago Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 5119, Sacramento, CA 94249-0053; (916) 319-2053 Contact information for the Public Safety Committee Contact Information Assembly Public Safety Committee 1020 N Street (LOB), Room 111 Sacramento, California 95814 916.319.3744 phone 916.319.3745 fax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill History CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE : A.B. No. 334 AUTHOR(S) : Cooley (Coauthors: Achadjian, Ch?vez, Gallagher, Gray, Olsen, Perea, and Wagner). TOPIC : Peace officers: training: profiling of motorcycle riders. HOUSE LOCATION : ASM TYPE OF BILL : Active Non-Urgency Non-Appropriations Majority Vote Required State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 02/23/2015 LAST HIST. ACTION : Referred to Com. on PUB. S. COMM. LOCATION : ASM PUBLIC SAFETY HEARING DATE : 03/24/2015 TITLE : An act to add Section 13519.17 to the Penal Code, relating to the profiling of motorcycle riders. Bill As Written 3/14/2015 California Legislature?2015?16 Regular Session Assembly BillNo. 334 _____ Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley (Coauthors: Assembly Members Achadjian, Ch?vez, Gallagher, Gray, Olsen, Perea, and Wagner) February 13, 2015 _____ An act to add Section 13519.17 to the Penal Code, relating to the profiling of motorcycle riders. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL?S DIGEST AB 334, as introduced, Cooley. Peace officers: training: profiling of motorcycle riders. Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training in the Department of Justice and requires the commission to adopt rules establishing minimum standards regarding the recruitment of peace officers. Existing law requires the commission to develop guidelines and implement courses of instruction regarding racial profiling, handling domestic violence, hate crimes, and human trafficking, among others. This bill would require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to ensure that the profiling of motorcycle riders is addressed in the course of basic law enforcement training and offered to law enforcement officers in conjunction with existing training regarding profiling. The bill would require all local law enforcement agencies to adopt a written policy designed to condemn and prevent the profiling of motorcycle riders and to review and audit any existing policies to ensure that those policies do not enable or foster the practice of profiling motorcycle riders. Because this bill would impose additional duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: P2 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the 2following: 3(a)?Millions of Americans ride motorcycles. They may commute 4to work on a motorcycle or ride for pleasure after work and on 5weekends. 6(b)?A prominent motorcycle organization, the American 7Motorcycle Association, has over 215,000 members. Their 8members are on average 46 years of age. 9(c)?There are approximately 2,700 motorcycle schools across 10the United States recognized by the Motorcycle Safety Foundation. 11Of these, 130 are located in California, where the Motorcycle 12Safety Foundation contracts with the California Highway Patrol 13to administer the California Motorcyclist Safety Program. The 14curriculum of motorcycle schools in California is typical, consisting 15of approximately three hours of online instruction, five hours of 16classroom instruction, and 10 hours of instruction on the 17motorcycle range. Fees for these schools range from $250 to $350, 18inclusive, and the failure rate is around 13 to 15 percent, inclusive. 19(d)?Since its inception in 1987, Motorcycle Safety 20Foundation-authorized schools in California have educated 900,000 21Californians in motorcycle safety, including 62,000 in 2013. 22(e)?A rising number of older Americans have begun riding 23motorcycles. For instance, a 2011 Wall Street Journal article, 24?When Heaven Is a Harley: The 50-plus crowd is having a belated 25romance with motorcycles? focuses on the increased interest in 26motorcycling among older Americans. P3 1(f)?According to the Department of Motor Vehicles, Californians 2over 50 years of age constitute 47 percent of the nearly 1.4 million 3Californians licensed to operate motorcycles. Nationally, the 4average age of motorcycle owners rose from 33 to 40 over the past 510 years. 6(g)?One observer of the trend toward older beginner 7motorcyclists has said, ?A lot of them say they were just too busy 8with careers and kids until now, and they?ve reached a point in 9life where they want to try something different.? 10(h)?An older proponent of motorcycling has described 11motorcycling?s appeal as a ?really good feeling similar to downhill 12skiing, effortlessly moving through the fresh air.? 13(i)?Additionally, motorcycles are more fuel-efficient than cars 14and a shift to motorcycle commuting may potentially reduce traffic 15congestion and emissions, thereby aligning with California?s goals 16under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 1732) to reduce the transportation sector?s carbon footprint. 18 SEC. 2. Section 13519.17 is added to the Penal Code, to read: 19 13519.17. (a)?The Commission on Peace Officer Standards 20and Training shall ensure that the profiling of motorcycle riders 21is addressed in the course of basic law enforcement training and 22offered to law enforcement officers in conjunction with existing 23training regarding profiling. 24(b)?Every local law enforcement agency shall adopt a written 25policy designed to condemn and prevent the profiling of motorcycle 26riders and shall review and audit existing procedures, practices, 27and training materials, to ensure that they do not enable or foster 28the practice of profiling motorcycle riders. 29(c)?For purposes of this section, ?profiling of motorcycle riders? 30means using the fact that a person rides a motorcycle or wears 31motorcycle paraphernalia as a factor, without any individualized 32suspicion of the particular person, in deciding to stop and question, 33take enforcement action, arrest, or search a person or vehicle, with 34or without legal basis under the California Constitution or the 35United States Constitution. 36 SEC. 3. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that 37this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to 38local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made P4 1pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 24 of Title 2 of the Government Code. FREE Animations for your email Click Here! _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4306/9308 - Release Date: 03/15/15 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4306/9308 - Release Date: 03/15/15 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: butterfly_bottom.gif Type: image/gif Size: 20662 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 12626 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nemecek at san.rr.com Sun Mar 29 10:59:57 2015 From: nemecek at san.rr.com (Nancy Nemecek) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:59:57 -0700 Subject: [ABATE Local 6 Elist] Urgent Request From Our Legislative Director 03 28 2015 ACTION NEEDED Message-ID: <0e2701d06a4a$2badf7d0$8309e770$@rr.com> I know you?ve been inundated with legislative requests recently, but please don?t delete this but rather take ACTION. We are a motorcycle rights organization after all! Please read the Legislative Director?s message below. You will probably just have to leave a message, so you can just read the very short message under SAMPLE LETTER. Simple enough. This should take under an hour to complete ? time well spent! After calling all the representatives on the Assembly Transportation Committee (see list at bottom), it would also be good to put a call into your representative. If you don?t know your Assembly Representatives, here?s a link that will find you the information based on where you live: http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/ . We are fortunate that we have the Speaker of the Assembly in San Diego ? Speaker Toni G. Atkins, District 78. Would be a good idea to call her, too, if she?s not your rep. Here?s a California State Assembly District Map http://www.sdvote.com/voters/Eng/maps/Assembly_Handout_2010.pdf. Now you have all the information you should need to make a dozen calls and help the cause. Thanks, Nancy From: news at abate.org [mailto:news at abate.org] On Behalf Of ABATE News Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 8:30 AM To: ABATE News Subject: Urgent Request From Our Legislative Director 03 28 2015 local 23 March 28, 2015 Dear ABATE of California Members AB 51 is coming to vote April 6 in the Assembly Transportation Committee. As the bill is written, there will be a 30 MPH lane sharing limit, with a 10 MPH speed differential. Your ABATE PAC has voted to not support this bill in its current state. There have been attempts to negotiate different speed limits. Assembly Member Quirk has been waiting for the results of a traffic study to help determine and support modifications to the speed limits. However, the report has been delayed. With the above in mind, I am requesting that all members contact the assembly transportation committee and the assembly members in your district requesting that they do not support AB51. Due to the time frame available please use the phone contacts provided below. Sporty said it took 30 minutes. Even on the weekend you can call these numbers and leave your message on their answering machines. Below is a quick note that you can utilize. The Assembly Transportation committee member contact information is also below. Please do this by April 1. I have contacted Jim Lombardo to also communicate the same position. Thank you, Chuck Pedersen Legislative Director ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SAMPLE LETTER Dear Assemblymember, I request that you do not support AB51, the motorcycle lane splitting bill. The bill as currently written does not fully address rider safety within the stated speed limits. Further studies should be conducted to determine the effect lane splitting speed limits. Thanks you for your attention to this matter Full Name Address City, state, zip Committee Members District Office & Contact Information Jim Frazier (Chair) Dem - 11 Contact Assembly Member Jim Frazier Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 3091, Sacramento, CA 94249-0011; (916) 319-2011 Katcho Achadjian (Vice Chair) Rep - 35 Contact Assembly Member Katcho Achadjian Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4098, Sacramento, CA 94249-0035; (916) 319-2035 Catharine B. Baker Rep - 16 Contact Assembly Member Catharine B. Baker Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4153, Sacramento, CA 94249-0016; (916) 319-2016 Richard Bloom Dem - 50 Contact Assembly Member Richard Bloom Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2003, Sacramento, CA 94249-0050; (916) 319-2050 Nora Campos Dem - 27 Contact Assembly Member Nora Campos Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4016, Sacramento, CA 94249-0027; (916) 319-2027 Kansen Chu Dem - 25 Contact Assembly Member Kansen Chu Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 5175, Sacramento, CA 94249-0025; (916) 319-2025 Tom Daly Dem - 69 Contact Assembly Member Tom Daly Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 3126, Sacramento, CA 94249-0069; (916) 319-2069 Bill Dodd Dem - 04 Contact Assembly Member Bill Dodd Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2137, Sacramento, CA 94249-0004; (916) 319-2004 Eduardo Garcia Dem - 56 Contact Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4162, Sacramento, CA 94249-0056; (916) 319-2056 Jimmy Gomez Dem - 51 Contact Assembly Member Jimmy Gomez Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2114, Sacramento, CA 94249-0051; (916) 319-2051 Young O. Kim Rep - 65 Contact Assembly Member Young O. Kim Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4177, Sacramento, CA 94249-0065; (916) 319-2065 Eric Linder Rep - 60 Contact Assembly Member Eric Linder Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 2016, Sacramento, CA 94249-0060; (916) 319-2060 Jose Medina Dem - 61 Contact Assembly Member Jose Medina Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 5135, Sacramento, CA 94249-0061; (916) 319-2061 Melissa A. Melendez Rep - 67 Contact Assembly Member Melissa A. Melendez Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 6031, Sacramento, CA 94249-0067; (916) 319-2067 Adrin Nazarian Dem - 46 Contact Assembly Member Adrin Nazarian Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4146, Sacramento, CA 94249-0046; (916) 319-2046 Patrick O'Donnell Dem - 70 Contact Assembly Member Patrick O'Donnell Capitol Office P.O. Box 942849, Room 4166, Sacramento, CA 94249-0070; (916) 319-2070 Please do NOT respond directly to this email, it is NOT monitored for incoming messages. Please DO contact us at nick.benson at abate.org or carol at abate.org for questions or information. Thank you for being an ABATE member! Nick Benson Sr Board Member & Secretary ABATE of California, INC 10240 7th AVENUE HESPERIA, CA 92345-2631 Phone: 760.956.1669 / Fax 760.956.6519 http://www.abate.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 15874 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2454 bytes Desc: not available URL: